Medical imaging is crucial for diagnosing and treating various conditions by providing detailed, non-invasive interior views of the human body. Over the years, advancements have transformed these technologies from basic X-rays, primarily visualizing bones, to sophisticated MRI and CT scans that offer detailed images of soft tissues, organs and even metabolic processes. These innovations have significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning and patient outcomes. More recently, advocates claim that developments in artificial intelligence (AI) are further enhancing image analysis and reducing human error.
Unfortunately, human error is still relatively common for radiologists to misinterpret MRI, X-ray, or other imaging exams in 2024. Despite advancements in technology and training, the error rate in radiology has remained relatively consistent over the last 75 years of imaging, tainting approximately 3-4% of all cases.
Why human error remains an issue
Common reasons for these errors include:
- Human factors: Fatigue, cognitive biases and overconfidence can all contribute to mistakes.
- Complexity of cases: Some medical conditions are inherently difficult to diagnose, leading to higher misinterpretation rates.
- Technical issues: Poor image quality or improper imaging techniques can also result in errors.
Efforts to reduce these errors include peer reviews, second opinions and using AI to assist in image interpretation. However, the human element remains a significant factor in radiology.
Common legal grounds for a lawsuit
If you believe a radiologist has misread your MRI, X-ray, ultrasound or other imaging exam, which has led to harm or injury, you might have grounds for a medical malpractice lawsuit. Still, there are important factors to examine when determining if there was malpractice:
- Standard of care: The plaintiff’s attorney must demonstrate that the radiologist failed to provide the standard level of care expected in their field. It often requires expert testimony from another medical professional.
- Causation: You must prove that the radiologist’s error caused harm or injury. It’s not enough to show that the radiologist made a mistake; it must have negatively impacted your health.
- Damages: You must have suffered damages (physical, emotional or financial) as a result of the misreading. It could include additional medical bills, lost wages or pain and suffering.
In Connecticut, the statute of limitations for filing medical malpractice claims is generally two years from the date of the injury or when it was discovered (or from when it should have been discovered with reasonable care). However, there is an absolute limit of three years from the date of the act or omission that caused the injury.
These cases are complicated
Due to the complex technological and medical knowledge involved in radiology-based claims, victims need to discuss the details of their specific cases with an experienced medical malpractice attorney who understands the laws here in Connecticut. They can evaluate the specifics of your case and guide the legal process for protecting your rights and future health.
